University of Pennsylvania Law Review

The Law Review has both a professional and an educational mission. It serves the legal profession, the bench, the bar, and the academy by providing a forum for the publication of original legal research of the highest quality. We accept and scrutinize approximately 2,000 written submissions annually to select approximately twelve articles in each volume.

You can access the online companion (formerly PENNumbra) at University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online

Visit our site at https://www.pennlawreview.com/ or email us.

View all issues

Symposium Issue: The Uses (and Misuses) of History in Constitutional Interpretation

Volume 173 Masthead

Jack M. Balkin, Yale Law School

Kermit Roosevelt III, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Jessie Gorovitz, Fordham University School of Law

Alexander Tsesis, Florida State University College of Law

Stephanie Hall Barclay, Georgetown University Law Center

Sherif Gergis, Notre Dame Law School

Gregory Ablavsky, Stanford University

Paul A. Gowder, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law

Evan Bernick, Northern Illinois University College of Law

Ariela Gross, UCLA School of Law

Noah A. Roseblum, New York University School of Law

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

Current Issue: 173.7

Nino's Paradox

The Past is Always Changing: A Story in Three Parts

Originalist Framing of Free Speech Doctrine

The Democratic Deficit of Living Originalism

The Abuses of History in Constitutional Interpretation

Why We Should Stop Saying "The Founders"

Ameliorative Constitutionalism

Constitutions of Ice and Fire

Erasing Slavery: The Uses and Misuses of the History of Slavery and Reconstruction in Constitutional Interpretation

History and Fetishism in the New Separation of Powers Formalism

Explore the University of Pennsylvania Law Review